Colorado Water Table · Methodology
How the reports answer
What each report answers, how an answer is built from the law and the public record, and the rule a question must pass before it ships.
- Land report questions
- 10
- Development report questions
- 22
- Rights report questions
- 6
- Evidence radius
- 1 mile
- Datasets read
- 89
- Release gate
- 80% Settled
1 What each report answers
Each report covers one parcel. The Rights report answers holding by holding, for each decreed water right and well permit on the property. Search is free, and shows the likely answers across a parcel's section, to 9 of the Land report's 10 questions. The Land report gives the parcel's own answers. Questions marked gated are held to the release gate in section 11.
The Land report asks only what applies to the parcel. A home, a lot or a business on a water provider's system is not asked about a household well, animals, the groundwater trend, splitting the land or what water adds to its price, and the report names the questions it left out and says why. A parcel is on a provider's system when it lies inside a town, or inside a provider's service area where the state has all but stopped granting wells, and no well of its own is on record. What stands on it is the county assessor's land use, or, where the assessor publishes none, whether an address or a building is recorded there. Five acres or more of cropland, irrigated land or an irrigation right makes it a farm, and a farm is asked every question.
Land report
For someone buying rural land: what water comes with it, what you can build on, and what to ask before you close.
- What water will I legally have on the day I close? gated
- Can I get a household well, and what will it cost all in? gated
- Can I keep animals, a garden, horses? gated
- Is the groundwater holding up?
- Is it safe to drink? gated
- Can I build here, and on what water? gated
- Can I split it later?
- Is anything about the water likely to change in the next five years?
- What's land like this worth with water vs without?
- What should I ask the seller, and put in the contract?
Development report
For the engineer or attorney on a project: how many homes the water supports, the paths to more, and the filings, with the rule behind each answer.
- How many homes can this land support on water? gated
- Which water paths exist, ranked by cost and time? gated
- Is there a water provider that could serve it? gated
- What will the county require to approve it? gated
- Who's likely to object?
- What's the timeline and the permit list? gated
Also includes the 10 Land questions and the 6 Rights questions, answered in a builder's terms, with a list of the filings and permits a project needs.
Rights report
For the owner of a water right or a well: what you hold, what could take it away, and the dates not to miss. Covers decreed water rights and well permits.
- How much water can I actually use or sell? gated
- Could I lose it, and by when? gated
- How often will I get my water? gated
- Is anyone filing nearby who could hurt me, and what's my objection deadline? gated
- Am I in compliance? gated
- What would it take to change its use or sell it? gated
2 How an answer is built
Each question is answered from conditions. A condition is one test the law sets, such as whether a lot is 35 acres or more, whether it sits in a designated groundwater basin, and whether a decreed right has diverted water in the last ten years. It reads the statute or rule that sets the test and the public records for the parcel, and returns a ruling.
An answer starts from the ruling of the question's main condition and takes in the others it depends on. Where an agency decides case by case, the answer counts that agency's decisions on land within 1 mile and says how many point the same way. Where wells nearby inform the answer, it gives their depth and yield within 1 mile. Nearby wells are grouped on a quarter-mile grid, so "within about 1 mile" can take in a well a little past it or leave out one just inside, and the parcel report's well table marks the wells the depth was read from.
Every answer states its basis:
- State law decides this
- A statute or rule settles the answer for this parcel.
- From the public record
- An agency's record settles it.
- From decisions on nearby land
- The agency's decisions on land nearby point one way.
- Estimated from nearby records
- Wells, samples or sales nearby support a likely answer.
- The record doesn't settle this
- The card says what would.
Every sentence an answer can print is written in advance, for each state and each outcome, and filled from the record. Each card lists the law it applied, with the words relied on, and the records it read, with the date each was loaded.
The answers a report shows are checked against each other before it is published. A well one card says the land has is the well the next card builds on, and land a provider serves is not told to drill. A report whose answers disagree is held back until the cause is fixed.
3 Documents read, and checked
Some records are documents rather than data: the water court's monthly resumes of applications, the statements of opposition filed on them, and the decrees the court entered. A model reads each one, and nothing it reads is kept unless the document says it. Every name, number and quote is matched against the document's own text, and a figure the text does not contain is dropped.
Where a person has read a document or a name, that reading outranks the model's. The reviewed lists are part of every build: the parties to objections, with spellings, households and estates joined and counsel and agents set apart; and the decrees' rulings on whether water left the land it irrigated. A daily check lists any name a report could print that no one has reviewed.
A county's rules are read from its current published code. Where a county does not publish them, or its current text cannot be confirmed, the answer says It depends, names what the county does publish, and says why.
4 Who is likely to object
The Development report asks who is likely to object to a water filing near the parcel. It reads the statements of opposition filed in the water court, each read for who opposed, on what grounds, which of their own rights they said were at risk, and how the case ended. An opposition is placed where the application it opposes is: the sections the application names for what it asks the court to decree, not the reservoirs or ditches it only mentions.
Each party is counted once. A household, its trust and its estate are one party, and so are the spellings of one name; lawyers and agents acting for a party are not parties. The answer names who has objected nearby and how often, and where the record says, on what grounds and how those cases ended, with the distance on the card. It describes who watches the water there; it does not predict an objection to any one filing.
5 Historical consumptive use
A Colorado water right that changes its use or place is limited to the water it historically consumed, not the amount on its decree. The Rights report estimates that figure for each irrigation right with a diversion record, and the water court decides the real one.
- Diverted. DWR's monthly diversion records at the right's headgate.
- Delivered. Less ditch and field losses, at the conveyance and application efficiencies of the state's consumptive use model (StateCU).
- Needed. The crop irrigation requirement of the acres DWR mapped under the headgate, crop by crop, by the modified Blaney-Criddle method the water court hears. Where StateCU models the ditch, its figure; elsewhere computed from NOAA temperature and precipitation at the nearest station within 60 km, with StateCU's crop coefficients and growing seasons.
- Consumed. Each month, the lesser of water delivered and water needed. A month's surplus is held in the soil, up to what the soil can store, for a later short month. Water already in the soil when the study period begins is not counted: it was diverted before the years being measured.
The estimate is the average over the most recent 20 years with a full irrigation season, a period that must include a dry year and a wet one; fewer than 10 such years is a thin record and the card says so. It is shown as a range: low and high take the low and high efficiencies and the smaller and larger mapped acreage, and the range always contains the estimate. Where several rights share a headgate, its water is credited day by day, since 2000, to the rights that were in priority under the call record, most senior first, each up to its decreed rate.
It is never Settled. Only a decree settles historical consumptive use, so the card is Likely at best and It depends on a short or unrepresentative record. It does not compute return flows, injury to other rights, dry-up obligations or the amount a court would let move, and it counts only the ditch's water: a crop also watered by a well consumed some well water that the ditch right cannot claim.
Checked against the state's model
On every ditch StateCU models on its own, the estimate is compared with the state's published supply-limited consumptive use over the years both cover.
| Basin | Ditches | Ours ÷ state (median) | Median gap | 90% within |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Platte | 76 | 0.97 | 4% | 20% |
| North Platte | 44 | 1.00 | 4% | 10% |
| Rio Grande | 240 | 0.95 | 5% | 20% |
The crop requirement alone, computed by our method, against StateCU's per acre:
| Basin | Ditch-years | Ours ÷ state (median) | Median gap | 90% within |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Platte | 11,558 | 1.08 | 11% | 28% |
| North Platte | 19,080 | 1.14 | 14% | 43% |
| Rio Grande | 25,382 | 1.01 | 13% | 34% |
| Colorado mainstem | 5,272 | 1.11 | 19% | 55% |
Checked against the water court
Where a change decree states how much water per acre the court found a ditch historically consumed, the estimate for that headgate is compared with it. This reaches the Arkansas, Gunnison and San Juan, where the state publishes no model output. Each decree speaks for one right over its own study years and acres, so the table shows how far the estimate sits from what courts have found on a few headgates, not an error on any one of them.
| Division | Supply | Headgates | Ours ÷ court (median) | Median gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Platte | Ditch only | 6 | 1.01 | 17% |
| South Platte | With wells | 9 | 1.06 | 6% |
| Arkansas | Ditch only | 12 | 0.86 | 37% |
| Arkansas | With wells | 3 | 0.79 | 33% |
| Rio Grande | Ditch only | 1 | 2.02 | 101% |
| Rio Grande | With wells | 2 | 0.91 | 31% |
| Gunnison | Ditch only | 7 | 1.61 | 61% |
| Colorado mainstem | Ditch only | 34 | 1.42 | 42% |
| Yampa, White and North Platte | Ditch only | 2 | 1.28 | 28% |
| San Juan | Ditch only | 10 | 1.31 | 42% |
6 Homes on Denver Basin water
Under most of the Denver metro area and the plains east and south of it lie six bedrock aquifers. The State Engineer allocates their water to the land above: each acre may withdraw 1% a year of the water recoverable beneath it, the aquifer's saturated sand thickness times its specific yield, over a 100-year aquifer life. The Development report counts the homes that water supports on the parcel.
- Sand under the land. The State Engineer's presumptive net sand thickness for each aquifer under the parcel's section, from DWR's Denver Basin location tool. A site study can rebut it.
- Water per acre. Net sand times the rule's specific yield, divided by 100 years: Upper and Lower Dawson 20%; Denver, Upper and Lower Arapahoe 17%; Laramie-Fox Hills 15%.
- The county's standard. The parcel's acres times that, scaled to the years of supply the county requires, divided by the water it assumes per home.
homes = acres × Σ (net sand ft × specific yield) ÷ 100 × 100 ÷ years of supply ÷ AF per home
Each card prints this working with its own figures. For example, a 223.3-acre parcel in Elbert County:
| Step | Working | AF a year |
|---|---|---|
| Lower Dawson, per acre | 103.8 ft × 20% ÷ 100 | 0.208 |
| Denver, per acre | 345.1 ft × 17% ÷ 100 | 0.587 |
| Upper Arapahoe, per acre | 264.8 ft × 17% ÷ 100 | 0.450 |
| Laramie-Fox Hills, per acre | 169.0 ft × 15% ÷ 100 | 0.254 |
| All four, per acre | sum | 1.498 |
| The parcel, 100-year rule | × 223.3 acres | 334.5 |
| Elbert County, 300 years | × 100 ÷ 300 | 111.5 |
| Homes the water supports | ÷ 0.4 AF per home | 278 homes |
| County | Years of supply | AF per home | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adams | 300 | 0.3 | Adams County code |
| Douglas | 100 | 1 | Douglas County code |
| El Paso | 300 | 0.26 | El Paso County code |
| Elbert | 300 | 0.4 | Elbert County code |
| Any other county | 100 | 0.3 | State Engineer's standard rate |
The count is the water's limit, not the county's: zoning and well-and-septic density usually allow far fewer homes, and the card says so. It is Likely at best, because the sand figures are presumptive. Water from the shallowest aquifers near streams (not-nontributary) needs a court-approved augmentation plan before it can be used. A designated groundwater basin is the Ground Water Commission's, and a parcel a water provider serves gets the provider's answer instead.
7 Water from a provider
A parcel is served by a water system when it lies in an area the system serves in practice and no well of record is on it. For a served parcel, the Land report reads three things from the provider's own documents.
- Tap fee. What the provider charges for water to connect a new single-family home: its tap fee, system development charge, plant investment fee, water resource fee or cash in lieu of raw water, from its fee schedule or city code. Sewer, meter and permit fees are left out. Where the fee differs inside and outside a city, or by lot size, the report gives the one that applies to the parcel.
- Watering rules. The rule a household follows to water a lawn now, from the provider's drought page or its latest notice, with the date it took effect where the provider gives one.
- Lead service lines. What the provider's service line inventory lists for the line to the address, where it publishes one by address. Otherwise, the counts it reports to EPA, which do not say which addresses.
Every fee and watering rule is read by a person from the provider's own page or schedule, never from a news story or a list someone else compiled, and kept with the page's address and a line quoted from it. Each month the page is fetched again and the line looked for. A rule whose line has not been found in 62 days is no longer printed. Watering rules change with the season, so a summer page is never read as the rule in force after it ends.
Where a provider publishes no fee schedule, or no current watering rule, the report says so and gives the provider's phone and email from its record in the federal drinking water register.
8 Settled, Likely and It depends
- Settled
- The law or the public record decides the answer for this parcel.
- Likely
- The answer is estimated from nearby records or decisions. The card begins “Likely” and shows the evidence.
- It depends
- The answer turns on something the public record does not hold, such as a deed or the date a lot was created. The card states each outcome and what decides between them.
In a section's free Land summary, an answer that differs between parcels is marked Varies, with each answer and the number of parcels it covers.
9 Who decides
Every answer names who has the final say and the next step to take with them. For example:
- The Division of Water Resources, on a well permit
- The water court, on a decree, a change of use or a statement of opposition
- The division engineer, on calls
- The county, on a subdivision, after the State Engineer's review
- The deed and the title search, on what conveys at closing
A report reads the public record. It is not legal advice, and it does not replace the decision it names.
10 Who to contact
When a next step names someone, the card says how to reach them. Where one office is the right one for the land, it is shown in full: name, phone, email and website, with where it was read and when. Where the buyer chooses among many, the card lists them, ranked.
- County planning offices: read on each county's own website, and checked there every month.
- Town offices: the state municipal league's directory of its towns.
- Water systems: the state's community water system records and the federal drinking water register.
- Well drillers: the state's list of licensed well drillers, ranked by the wells each has drilled in the county since 2016.
Where we hold no contact, the card says so rather than leave the step without one.
11 The release gate
A gated question ships in Colorado only when its answer is Settled on at least 80% of the state's rural parcels. Rights questions are measured on every holding. A Likely answer does not count toward the bar.
Where the law, or a public record that does not exist, makes a Settled answer impossible, a confirmed exception lets a parcel count. Its card must give the likely answer and name the document that decides it. These are the exceptions in force in Colorado:
When the lot was created
Can I get a household well, and what will it cost all in? · Can I keep animals, a garden, horses? · How many homes can this land support on water?
On a lot under 35 acres, the uses a household well may serve depend on whether the lot was created before June 1, 1972 or by a county exemption. No public record dates a lot's creation. The card states both outcomes and the statute.
- Law
- C.R.S. 37-92-602(3)(b)(II)(A)
- Decided by
- The plat date, from the title company.
Water rights and ditch shares convey by deed and stock
What water will I legally have on the day I close?
A decreed water right conveys by deed and may be reserved by the seller. Ditch water is company stock that transfers on the company's books. Neither transfer is in a public record before closing.
- Law
- C.R.S. 38-30-102; C.R.S. 7-42-104
- Decided by
- The deed and the title search, and the ditch company's share records.
Only a test of the well settles it
Is it safe to drink?
No public record says what comes out of one private well, and no agency tests it for the owner. The answer counts only when it gives a likely answer from sampling sites nearby, or from the USGS arsenic model, with the distance on the card.
- Law
- EPA, Private Drinking Water Wells
- Decided by
- A certified lab test of the well. Colorado State University's lab charges $87 for a household panel.
12 Records and datasets
Each report lists what is on record on the parcel and within 1 mile: decreed water rights, well permits, ditches, reservoirs and other structures, water court applications with their objection deadlines, oil and gas wells, flood zones, wildfire risk, irrigated land, public land and the bulk water stations haulers fill at. Each row gives its distance from the parcel and links to the agency's own page where there is one. The map draws wells, structures, oil and gas wells, streams, flood zones, irrigated land and public land.
Every dataset below is published by a public agency. Each report lists the ones it read, with their load dates.
| Dataset | Publisher | Rows | Loaded |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public land | Bureau of Land Management | 8 | October 5, 2026 |
| PLSS survey sections | Bureau of Land Management (CadNSDI) | 104,083 | October 1, 2026 |
| Federal mineral estate | Bureau of Land Management, Colorado State Office | 75,495 | October 5, 2026 |
| Spanish and Mexican land grants | Bureau of Land Management, PLSS CadNSDI | 45 | October 5, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Colorado Springs) | City of Colorado Springs | 9,178 | October 2, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (City of Pueblo) | City of Pueblo | 1,244 | October 2, 2026 |
| Municipal boundaries | Colorado Department of Local Affairs | 1,911 | October 9, 2026 |
| Water conservancy district boundaries | Colorado Department of Local Affairs | 40 | October 6, 2026 |
| Water districts and their mill levies | Colorado Department of Local Affairs, Division of Local Government | 517 | October 1, 2026 |
| Fire protection districts | Colorado Department of Local Affairs, via the state OIT portal | 245 | October 9, 2026 |
| Denver Basin aquifers under the land | Colorado Division of Water Resources | 16,230 | October 7, 2026 |
| Well permit outcomes | Colorado Division of Water Resources | 811,389 | October 5, 2026 |
| Administrative calls | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 35,877 | October 1, 2026 |
| Climate stations | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 4,962 | October 1, 2026 |
| Consumptive use by structure (StateCU) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 211,130 | October 8, 2026 |
| Crop water requirement (StateCU) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 112,891 | October 8, 2026 |
| Daily diversions | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 5,154,260 | October 8, 2026 |
| Denver Basin bedrock aquifers | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 6 | Fixed reference |
| Designated groundwater basins | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 8 | Fixed reference |
| Diversion records | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 132,228 | October 7, 2026 |
| Frost dates | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 20,546 | October 1, 2026 |
| Groundwater levels | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 11,338 | October 8, 2026 |
| Groundwater management districts | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 13 | Fixed reference |
| Groundwater monitoring wells | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 23,000 | October 1, 2026 |
| Irrigated lands | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 967,833 | October 1, 2026 |
| Irrigation efficiency (StateCU) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 270,306 | October 8, 2026 |
| Monthly diversions | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 2,035,908 | October 7, 2026 |
| Out-of-priority analysis | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 53,070 | October 8, 2026 |
| Over-appropriated areas (interim copy) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 107 | Fixed reference |
| Rio Grande response areas (Division 3) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 11 | Fixed reference |
| Soil water capacity (StateCU) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 3,166 | October 8, 2026 |
| Stream gauges | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 2,644 | October 1, 2026 |
| Streamflow, annual | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 2,397 | October 2, 2026 |
| Structure roster | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 211,502 | October 1, 2026 |
| Water districts | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 78 | Fixed reference |
| Water right transactions | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 310,897 | October 1, 2026 |
| Water rights (net amounts) | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 174,248 | October 1, 2026 |
| Well meter readings | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 525,759 | October 8, 2026 |
| Well permits | Colorado Division of Water Resources (CDSS) | 598,744 | October 1, 2026 |
| Licensed well construction and pump installation contractors | Colorado Division of Water Resources, Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors | 250 | October 8, 2026 |
| Subdivision referral opinions of the State Engineer | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 17,193 | September 10, 2026 |
| Water court case outcomes | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 25,886 | October 9, 2026 |
| Water court decrees, as written | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 19,327 | October 8, 2026 |
| Water court filings, as applied for | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 1,240 | October 8, 2026 |
| Water court resumes, 2007-2020 | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 18,381 | September 17, 2026 |
| Water court statements of opposition | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 18,455 | October 9, 2026 |
| Water court statements of opposition, filed | Colorado Division of Water Resources, WebLink document repository | 8,444 | October 9, 2026 |
| Administrative calls in force now | Colorado Division of Water Resources, active administrative calls | 118 | October 8, 2026 |
| Dam safety inventory | Colorado Division of Water Resources, dam safety | 2,737 | October 5, 2026 |
| Stream network and position | Colorado Division of Water Resources, stream network | 6,921 | October 5, 2026 |
| Substitute water supply plans | Colorado Division of Water Resources, substitute water supply plans | 305 | October 8, 2026 |
| Real-time gauge stations | Colorado Division of Water Resources, telemetry stations | 1,432 | October 5, 2026 |
| Oil and gas wells | Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission | 124,451 | October 5, 2026 |
| Parcels and ownership | Colorado Governors Office of Information Technology | 2,359,504 | August 18, 2026 |
| Water court resumes | Colorado Judicial Branch, Water Courts | 13,381 | October 5, 2026 |
| Colorado Municipal League, Municipal Directory | Colorado Municipal League | 270 | October 8, 2026 |
| Colorado business registry | Colorado Secretary of State | 3,116,526 | October 1, 2026 |
| Ditch company filing history | Colorado Secretary of State | 30,892 | October 4, 2026 |
| Instream flow and natural lake level rights | Colorado Water Conservation Board, via the Colorado Information Marketplace | 2,427 | October 8, 2026 |
| Utility water service areas | Denver Water and Aurora Water | 19 | October 2, 2026 |
| Parcel subdivision filings (Douglas County) | Douglas County | 158,800 | October 2, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Douglas County) | Douglas County | 4,881 | October 2, 2026 |
| Parcel owners (El Paso County) | El Paso County | 278,440 | October 2, 2026 |
| Flood hazard zones | FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer | 59,804 | October 1, 2026 |
| Groundwater quality samples | Federal Water Quality Portal (USGS and EPA) | 224,910 | October 9, 2026 |
| Groundwater quality sampling stations | Federal Water Quality Portal (USGS and EPA) | 9,227 | October 9, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (La Plata County) | La Plata County | 4,540 | October 2, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Mesa County) | Mesa County | 6,621 | October 2, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Montrose County) | Montrose County | 3,531 | October 5, 2026 |
| Monthly temperature and precipitation | NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information | 149,936 | October 3, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Pueblo County) | Pueblo County | 4,129 | October 2, 2026 |
| Parcels and ownership (counties absent from the state composite) | The ten county assessor GIS servers (Chaffee via the City of Salida) | 187,206 | October 7, 2026 |
| County boundaries | US Census Bureau, TIGERweb | 79 | October 5, 2026 |
| Incorporated places (cities and towns) | US Census Bureau, TIGERweb | 365 | October 7, 2026 |
| Community water system service areas | US Environmental Protection Agency | 759 | October 2, 2026 |
| How the stream segments connect | US Environmental Protection Agency and US Geological Survey, NHDPlus V2.1 | 1,273,458 | Fixed reference |
| Stream segment attributes | US Environmental Protection Agency and US Geological Survey, NHDPlus V2.1 | 913,520 | Fixed reference |
| The mapped stream network | US Environmental Protection Agency and US Geological Survey, NHDPlus V2.1 | 963,806 | Fixed reference |
| Drinking water enforcement actions | US Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Information System | 56,296 | September 4, 2026 |
| Drinking water violations | US Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Information System | 41,826 | September 4, 2026 |
| Public drinking water systems | US Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Information System | 5,112 | September 4, 2026 |
| Which county each system serves | US Environmental Protection Agency, Safe Drinking Water Information System | 4,958 | September 4, 2026 |
| Arsenic in domestic wells (modeled) | US Geological Survey | 3,628,485 | Fixed reference |
| Streams and watercourses | US Geological Survey, National Hydrography Dataset | 257,801 | October 5, 2026 |
| Fire and EMS stations | US Geological Survey, National Map structures | 1,467 | October 9, 2026 |
| Wildland-urban interface | USDA Forest Service / SILVIS Lab wildland-urban interface | 162,371 | October 1, 2026 |
| Soil and septic suitability | USDA NRCS Soil Data Access (SSURGO) | 97,497 | October 7, 2026 |
| Recorded exemptions (Weld County) | Weld County | 10,321 | October 2, 2026 |
| Subdivision plats (Weld County) | Weld County | 5,275 | October 2, 2026 |
13 The download
A report downloads as one zip file:
- report.pdf: the report as published.
- answers.csv: every answer, with its confidence, basis, who decides and its sources.
- sources.csv: every law and record cited, with the words relied on and each dataset's age.
- rights.csv, wells.csv, structures.csv, filings.csv and oil-gas.csv: the records on and near the parcel, when the report lists any.
- holdings.csv, dates.csv, checklist.csv: the holdings, deadlines and documents to ask for, when the report has them.
- README.txt: the subject, the record date and what each file holds.
A report is published under a version and never overwritten, so the files always match the report of that version.
14 What the reports do not cover
- Title. A report does not search title or confirm who owns the parcel.
- Liens and encumbrances. A report does not search for them.
- Legal access. A report does not establish a right of way to the parcel.
- Appraisal. The Land report compares sales nearby with and without water. It does not value the parcel.
- Legal advice. Each answer names who decides; that decision is theirs.